Home / RHTP Hub / RHTP Initiative Playbooks

RHTP Initiative Playbooks

Alaska's RHTP framework is organized into six interconnected strategic initiatives. Each section provides context, allowable activities, key resources, and implementation considerations specific to that initiative.

This content is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute official RHTP guidance, legal advice, or compliance direction. Verify all information with the Alaska Department of Health and qualified professionals. Full Disclaimer.

Cross-Initiative Note

Most successful RHTP projects will span multiple initiatives. A workforce recruitment project (Initiative 5) that incorporates telehealth training (Initiative 6) and targets maternal health deserts (Initiative 1) is stronger than a single-initiative project.

1. Healthy Beginnings

Maternal and child health investments targeting Alaska’s persistent disparities in birth outcomes, prenatal access, and early childhood health.

Focus Areas

  • Expanding prenatal and postnatal care access in communities without local obstetric services
  • Telehealth-enabled prenatal monitoring for high-risk pregnancies in remote areas
  • Community health worker programs focused on maternal health education
  • Integration of behavioral health screening into prenatal care workflows
  • Midwifery expansion and birth center development
  • Pediatric specialty access through hub-and-spoke telehealth models

Implementation Considerations

Alaska’s maternal mortality rate is significantly above the national average. Projects should demonstrate cultural competency and ideally partner with Tribal Health Organizations. The 5-year provider retention commitment is particularly relevant here, as obstetric providers have historically high turnover in rural Alaska.

2. Health Care Access

Expanding essential healthcare services in remote communities where geographic isolation creates persistent access barriers.

Focus Areas

  • Emergency department alternatives and urgent care expansion
  • Community Health Aide Program (CHAP) expansion and modernization
  • Mobile and itinerant clinic models for communities without fixed facilities
  • Dental health access (Alaska has some of the worst dental outcomes nationally)
  • Pharmacy access and medication management in communities without local pharmacies
  • Transportation assistance for patients requiring care at regional hubs

Implementation Considerations

Alaska has 665,000 square miles and 1.3 people per square mile. Many communities are accessible only by air or water. Infrastructure spending (20% cap) is most likely to be utilized in this initiative area.

3. Healthy Communities

Prevention-focused programs addressing chronic disease, behavioral health, substance use, and social determinants of health.

Focus Areas

  • Chronic disease prevention and management (diabetes, cardiovascular, cancer screening)
  • Behavioral health integration into primary care settings
  • Substance use disorder treatment expansion, including MAT
  • Community health worker (CHW) certification and deployment
  • Social determinants of health screening and referral pathways
  • Food security and nutrition programs in food-insecure communities

Implementation Considerations

Community-level health improvement requires sustained engagement. RHTP’s first budget period is only 10 months. Focus on establishing infrastructure (training CHWs, building screening workflows, creating referral networks) that can be sustained and expanded in subsequent years.

4. Pay for Value: Fiscal Sustainability

Transitioning Alaska’s rural healthcare from fee-for-service to value-based arrangements that reward outcomes over volume.

Focus Areas

  • Value-based care (VBC) model design and pilot implementation
  • Quality measurement infrastructure and health outcomes tracking
  • Alternative payment model (APM) development for rural settings
  • Financial sustainability planning for rural health facilities
  • Cost and utilization analytics to support VBC decision-making

Implementation Considerations

Value-based care in rural Alaska faces unique challenges: small patient panels make statistical quality measurement unreliable, many communities rely on a single provider, and healthcare costs 2-5x more than urban settings. The 15% provider payment cap is relevant as VBC transition incentives may be classified as provider payments.

5. Strengthen Workforce

Building, recruiting, and retaining the healthcare workforce Alaska needs.

Focus Areas

  • Provider recruitment incentives with 5-year service commitment
  • Retention bonuses and support programs for existing rural providers
  • Housing placement assistance in communities with severe housing shortages
  • Child care supports to remove a primary barrier to rural practice
  • Pipeline development: training programs, residency tracks, AHEC partnerships
  • Community Health Aide and behavioral health aide training expansion
  • Telehealth training and digital health competency development

Implementation Considerations

Workforce is the binding constraint for virtually every other RHTP initiative. Two non-obvious barriers dominate: housing availability and child care. Many remote communities have zero available rental housing and no formal child care. RHTP explicitly allows funding for both. Recruitment timelines run 6-12 months; hiring needs to start immediately upon award.

6. Spark Technology & Innovation

Digital health, telehealth, interoperability, and emerging technology solutions to overcome geographic barriers.

Focus Areas

  • Telehealth platform deployment and expansion
  • Health Information Exchange (HIE) and interoperability improvements
  • EHR system upgrades and replacements (5% EMR cap applies)
  • Remote patient monitoring for chronic disease management
  • AI and machine learning applications in clinical decision support
  • Cybersecurity improvements for health IT infrastructure

Implementation Considerations

The 10% / $20M technology cap is tight. Interoperability is the highest-leverage investment: connecting existing systems so patient data follows the patient. Broadband infrastructure is prohibited, so projects must work within existing connectivity. Satellite-based and low-bandwidth telehealth solutions are relevant for Alaska’s most remote communities.

ONC Interoperability Standards

Health IT investments should align with ONC standards, including FHIR and TEFCA. Projects advancing interoperability are viewed favorably by CMS.

Initiative descriptions based on Alaska’s RHTP Project Narrative and publicly available program documents.